Skip to main content

What GURPS Doesn't Have

I was reading this post by Refplace about common GURPS myths: it's dead (no, it gets regular monthly support and doesn't need a new edition), there are no settings (no, there's a zillion of them), and so on. And while GURPS has lots of stuff, the no-settings meme in particular did get me thinking about notable gaps which still exist in the GURPS line. I can think of three gaps that might usefully be filled.

A vehicle design system is, of course, one of those gaps. Many games need no such thing, but general-purpose rules for stuff are very much in GURPS's lane. The 4e vehicle design book is still going through its interminable process, so I suppose we'll see it when we see it. I'm curious as to whether we'll ever see a similar gun-design system, which would also be appropriate.

Then there's a setting line. Yes, yes, I know. GURPS has settings. It has many settings. I would respectfully submit that there's no setting line for 4e in the way there is for other RPGs. What I'm talking about here is an integrated line of works covering notable people and places with playable adventures, and maybe even custom rules. Dungeon Fantasy has rules and adventures, but only one real location, and that ties in weakly with the adventures. Everything outlines, as I often say, the kind of place a DF world is, but not a specific world or adventuring region. Banestorm has a couple of setting works and a martial arts supplement, but no adventures native to 4e. Transhuman Space has conversion guides but the core is 3rd edition. 4e lacks, say, the book about Immortal City-State of Gyrxx, an adventure in the sewers of Gyrxx parts one through three, a supplement with stats for various inhabitants and enemies of Gyrxx, an adventure dealing with the swamp lizard attacks on Gyrxx parts one to three, and so on. That kind of completely ready-made, out-of-the-box set of materials doesn't exist. Yes, I'm aware of the good and sufficient business reasons why these things don't exist and are unlikely to exist, so don't @ me, as the kids say. I'm just observing that it doesn't exist. (That said, I note with some interest that Douglas Cole seems to be moving in this direction with his DFRPG work, and I Have Ideas about retroactively bringing together existing DF works in to a more coherent whole which I hope shall see the light of day at some point.)

Finally, there's the big sci-fi supplement. With its history of supporting things like Transhuman Space and yet another implementation of Traveller, 4e is notably lacking in the star-faring science fiction department. Yes, there's GURPS Space and GURPS Ultra-Tech, but the subjects which have received the most elaboration by far are historical/fantasy gaming (DF, the Low Tech line, and most of the Locations to date are pointed more or less that way) and modern-ish gaming (High Tech, all of the gun-related books, and the Action and Monster Hunters lines). But where, for 4e, is GURPS Space Explorers? Where is GURPS Bug Hunt? I've been involved in actual discussions concerning the latter with both SJ Games and other authors, but nothing has yet emerged from those. Perhaps it's time to kick those off again.

Comments

Rory said…
Aww you read my blog :)
Yeah Douglas Cole at Gaming Ballistic looks like he has solid plans for a DF setting.
In fact I need to update that section of my blog.
As for other genres SJG always had Adventures on the wishlist and that may be the way to go for other settings.
You want Bughunt? Propose it as an adventure with ways to expand it and still be coherent in later adventures.
Good post overall, thats just my take on what seems the successful move.
Rory said…
Wandered over here after reading your latest entry. You may have that DF setting issue licked now. As for a Bughunt setting, I came up with what I think is a solid idea but doubt my name would sell it and settings are a tough sell so I intend to pitch it if and when I get a few more books under my belt.
On the other hand if there seems interest I might propose it sooner than later, truthfully though I think rules oriented books are easier to write so more practice first is good.

Popular posts from this blog

Car Wars Minis, Third Batch

Still having a go at these, trying out some new ideas. The short version is that having the right tools and materials is still key, but I've got a way to go with some other stuff. I think this one looks better in person than as a picture. A couple of shades of blue here with a blue wash and drybrushed metallic blue on some components. Oh, and purple spikes. I didn't even try to figure out something clever to do with the windshield. I'm finding that it's hard to make yellow work, but this one wasn't too bad. I initially tried masking the area for the blue stripe with tape, but it pulled off the paint instead. Had to do a swipe with a broad brush, which isn't great but worked better than I expected. Another one that looks better in person than on film. Tried to do a few different shades of green, which wasn't entirely successful. Probably my best out of this batch. I credit the red wash, which ended up being kind of glossy and goes well with the copper accents

Car Wars Minis, Second Batch

They say it's a poor craftsman who blames their tools. Is it a poor craftsman who gives them credit when things work out? If so, I am that craftsman. After my first round of not-great miniature painting, I ran off some more CW minis and tried more painting, this time digging up my well-hidden actually-for-minis paints (as opposed to the standard craft store acrylics I used the first time around), which I had more than I thought I did, and limited myself to my tiniest brushes. I also watched a few more YouTube videos about painting minis just to get a better feel for what it looked like when people did that. How did it come out? Still not great, but better. The first of batch #2 and by a considerable margin the worst. Involved some ill-advised dry brushing and the metallic paint I used for the weapons and I didn't thin the metallic paint I used on the weapons and side windows, losing all the detail in the process. This one...is actually OK. The thinned blue and purple paints gi

Charcuterie Bard

A few days ago, I dropped this random gag:   I shall make a character for an RPG who has powers related to artistic creativity, but instead of music and song, they come from arranging cheeses and cured meats. A charcuterie bard. — Turhan's Bey Company (@turhansbeycmpny) December 21, 2021   But then I remembered that there's absolutely precedent for food-based magic:  So, then, obviously we can have food-based bards in GURPS, right? The best approach I see is modifying the Enthrallment skills (p. B191). However, rather than requiring Public Speaking at 12+ as a prerequisite, a charcuterie bard requires Cooking and Professional Skill (Food Stylist) at 12+; see Ferrous Metal Food Fighting Guy for a bit on the latter. The skills are used by preparing and feeding an audience with tasty, tasty foods. The elements of food in question cost a minimum of 1% of COL per target, though higher quality ingredients provide a bonus (use costs and reaction bonuses for styling, GURPS Low-Tech